Arizona Veterans Charged Fees by VetLink Solutions for VA Disability Claim Help Are Getting Checks From a $1.2 Million Restitution Fund
The window to file closed on Sept. 10, so the Arizona veterans in line for restitution from VetLink Solutions are the ones who already sent in a claim form. Attorney General Kris Mayes announced on Oct. 28 that VetLink paid $1.2 million into a restitution fund, and that checks would begin going out the same week, according to the Arizona Attorney General’s office.
The attorney general’s office alleges that the company charged disabled veterans fees for help with VA disability claims without the accreditation the law requires for that work. The company resolved the lawsuit through a consent judgment, and the allegations remain the state’s claims rather than court findings.
Who Qualifies: Paid VetLink and Filed by Sept. 10
Eligible veterans are those who paid consulting fees to VetLink Solutions for disability claim help between January 2019 and March 13, 2024, and who filed a claim form by the Sept. 10, 2026 deadline, the attorney general’s release says. The deadline has passed. The Money Overview, which reported on the distribution, said veterans who paid but missed the date are outside this fund and that no second round has been announced.
Checks arrive by mail from the settlement administrator rather than from the state, the same report said. The attorney general’s page tells veterans who filed and have not received a check to wait 14 days and then contact the settlement administrator at 866-880-0070. Veterans who have moved are advised to contact the administrator before checks are mailed.
What the Attorney General Alleges
The state sued VetLink Solutions under the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act, and the consent judgment resolved that suit. The conduct period named in the case runs from January 2019 through March 13, 2024.
According to the attorney general, the company falsely marketed its services and charged disabled veterans contingency fees for help filing VA disability claims, without being recognized as a Veterans Service Organization or holding the legal accreditation required for that work. The company is legally White Tanks Group LLC, doing business as VetLink Solutions, according to the Money Overview report.
AZFamily, a Phoenix television station, covered the settlement when it was announced on May 21. Its report said the state alleged the company claimed it could guide veterans through the VA benefits process, promised unrealistic benefit increases and charged substantial fees for services that only accredited VA representatives are authorized to provide. Those are allegations from the state, and the consent judgment, as described by the station, bars the company from misleading consumers about its ability to prepare, present or prosecute VA benefit claims unless it has received VA accreditation.
A $1.2 Million Fund Inside a $1.95 Million Deal
The May announcement put the overall settlement at $1.95 million in restitution, civil penalties and fees, AZFamily reported. The $1.2 million restitution fund is the part that goes to veterans. The attorney general has not broken down how the rest of the $1.95 million is divided.
Mayes said in the October release that her office was proud to have secured the settlement on behalf of Arizona veterans and that it would keep holding accountable anyone who takes advantage of them. In May she said, “Veterans deserve trusted assistance, not deceptive sales tactics,” according to AZFamily.
The timeline ran in steps. The consent judgment was entered earlier in 2026 and announced on May 21, with eligible veterans told they would be contacted by mail. The claim form deadline fell on Sept. 10, and the attorney general’s distribution announcement followed on Oct. 28, roughly seven weeks after the filing window closed.
No Amount or Head Count Announced Yet
The attorney general has not published how many veterans filed claims or how much each check will be. Dividing the $1.2 million fund by an unknown number of claimants cannot produce a payment figure, so any per-veteran estimate would be a guess. The Money Overview made the same point, noting that the amounts are undisclosed.
How to Check Whether a Claims Helper Is VA-Accredited
The VA’s Office of General Counsel runs an accreditation program that covers attorneys, claims agents and veterans service organization representatives. The VA says accreditation exists for the sole purpose of providing representation services to claimants before the VA, and that it does not imply a representative is qualified to provide financial planning or is otherwise endorsed by the department. The VA also warns that claimants should exercise caution when selecting a representative.
The VA keeps a separate page listing recognized veterans service organizations, which is the category the attorney general said VetLink did not belong to. The VA also publishes an email address for its accreditation mailbox for veterans to ask questions or report incorrect information in the search results.
The VA recommends confirming a person’s status by searching for the name in its Accreditation and Recognition Search on the General Counsel’s website. On fees, the page says a fee agreement that has the VA pay a representative directly from past-due benefits must be filed with the VBA Regional Office, and other agreements go to the accreditation program. It does not state specific fee amounts.
Veterans in Arizona who believe they were the victim of consumer fraud can file a complaint through the attorney general’s consumer complaint page. Its Consumer Information and Complaint Unit handles complaints and runs an informal process to help resolve disputes. The attorney general’s release lists phone numbers of (602) 542-5763 in Phoenix, (520) 628-6648 in Tucson and (800) 352-8431 elsewhere in Arizona. A new complaint does not reopen the VetLink claim period, the Money Overview noted.
Get stories like this by email. Sign up for The Parent Diaries Letter.
This article was produced with AI assistance and edited for accuracy against the sources linked above.
Image: David Jiang – CC BY-SA 4.0/Wikimedia Commons
